Iran should feel at danger if they continue to shun the UN and the peacekeeping goals of its agencies.
But threats of pre-emptive action by them is certainly only posturing, because that would be close to a national death sentence.
They must cooperate with the UN. How could this not be seen to be in their best interest?
Two options as I see it: (1) Iran denies the UN full access. Which results in war, debilitating sanctions or eventually both. Hastening serious or complete destruction of their country.
(2) Iran allows full access to the UN. Which allows for peaceful energy production, and good standing and protection by the UN itself.
The Iranian people should be able to vote on this, as it seems the government marches ultimately to option one.
"...The titles of the members of the visiting delegation is not inspectors. This is an expert delegation. The purpose of visit is not inspection,” said Mehmanparast. “The aim is to negotiate about cooperation between Iran and the agency and to set a framework for a continuation of the talks.”
Visits to individual Iranian nuclear sites were also not part of the IAEA earlier visit three weeks ago.
But on Monday, Iranian state radio said the U.N. team had asked to visit the Parchin military complex outside Tehran, a known conventional arms facility that has been suspected as a secret weapons-making location and also to meet Iranian nuclear scientists involved in the country’s controversial program
“Iran’s cooperation with the (IAEA) agency continues and is at its best level,” added Mehmanparast.
Also Tuesday, the deputy head of Iran’s armed forces said that Tehran is ready to take pre-emptive action against its foes if it feels that it is in danger...."
No comments:
Post a Comment